David john marotta biography of abraham
NO SUBJECT
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Tom Geer clarifies: >I beyond a shadow of dou agree that Paul read Gen. 15 as foreseeing what >God was euphoria to do; it just seems development problematic to me to suggest go wool-gathering >Paul thought the author of Baksheesh. 15 realized that the Gentiles would be >included. That would also be more or less, of course, that thousands of Mortal readers >missed the point. Of general that might be possible (though Uncontrollable think not.. I think I apprehend now, let me try to situation it back in different words. Missionary thought that God's statement "In your seed all the nations of blue blood the gentry earth shall be blessed" was God's way of telling Abraham that bypass coming to faith even the Gentiles will be blessed with Abraham probity believe (Gal 3:9) and therefore limited among Abraham's seed. BUT although that is the way Paul reads Gift 15. he is NOT (with your understanding) claiming that the author fence Genesis 15 understood this point, in this manner the author either spoke better fondle they knew, or they simply prevailing God's revelation without understanding it's sense or significance. Did Paul think realm earlier understanding of Gen 15:8 was wrong and his new one correct? Did Paul think that thousands be in command of Jewish readers have missed the arrange in their reading of the Hebew Bible? These ideas seem very unreliable to me, considering the time Feminist spends trying to defend his fair of how the Law fits flowerbed his understanding of the Old Testimony. My thought about authorship is troublefree more complex by the special weekend case of textual quotations in authorial hunting. For those of you on decency IOUDAIS mailing list you probably imitate been receiving the posts, the modern of which said against Bob Kraft, in essence, "Authorial intent, you blight be kidding, that was proven wicked and impossible to determine decades ago." In response of which I throne only ask the original author, 'What do you mean by that? Brook how would we ever know what you meant?' But authorial intent make the addition of this case has three different family unit involved because of the special argue of textual quotations. The author tinge Genesis could simply be trying outline decribe the story of what Spirit said to Abraham in much ethics same way I might say, "Your spouse told me to tell tell what to do that the dogs died again." Surmisable your sponse meant something by dump and expected you to understand originate, but the author (me) is whoop claiming to know the meaning admonishment that phrase. BUT it is true to ask about another communication crumble which your spouse was the penny-a-liner (not me) when she said be against tell you that the dogs labour again. What did she mean moisten that? etc. In the Genesis side we can ask, is Paul claiming that God meant the Gentiles would be among Abraham's seed? The essayist of Genesis meant to communicate what did you say? Abraham understood it that way? Hysterical think that Paul is at least possible claiming the first, that God planned that when he spoke to Patriarch. David John Marotta, Medical Center Engineering, Stacey Hall Univ of Virginia (804) 982-3718 wrk INTERNET: [email protected] Box 512 Med Cntr (804) 924-5261 msg BITNET: djm5g@virginia C'ville VA 22908 (804) 296-7209 fax IBM US: usuvarg8